A tailored approach to horizon scanning for cancer medicines.

BACKGROUND: Horizon scanning (HS) is the systematic identification of emerging therapies to inform policy and decision-makers. We developed an agile and tailored HS methodology that combined multi-criteria decision analysis weighting and Delphi rounds. As secondary objectives, we aimed to identify new medicines in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer most likely to impact the Australian government's pharmaceutical budget by 2025 and to compare clinician and consumer priorities in cancer medicine reimbursement. METHOD: Three cancer-specific clinician panels (total n = 27) and a consumer panel (n = 7) were formed. Six prioritisation criteria were developed with consumer input. Criteria weightings were elicited using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Candidate medicines were identified and filtered from a primary database and validated against secondary and tertiary sources. Clinician panels participated in a three-round Delphi survey to identify and score the top five medicines in each cancer type. RESULTS: The AHP and Delphi process was completed in eight weeks. Prioritisation criteria focused on toxicity, quality of life (QoL), cost savings, strength of evidence, survival, and unmet need. In both curative and non-curative settings, consumers prioritised toxicity and QoL over survival gains, whereas clinicians prioritised survival. HS results project the ongoing prevalence of high-cost medicines. Since completion in October 2021, the HS has identified 70 % of relevant medicines submitted for Pharmaceutical Benefit Advisory Committee assessment and 60% of the medicines that received a positive recommendation. CONCLUSION: Tested in the Australian context, our method appears to be an efficient and flexible approach to HS that can be tailored to address specific disease types by using elicited weights to prioritise according to incremental value from both a consumer and clinical perspective. POLICY SUMMARY: Since HS is of global interest, our example provides a reproducible blueprint for adaptation to other healthcare settings that integrates consumer input and priorities.

Targeting the dendritic cell-T cell axis to develop effective immunotherapies for glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma is an aggressive primary brain tumor that has seen few advances in treatments for over 20 years. In response to this desperate clinical need, multiple immunotherapy strategies are under development, including CAR-T cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses and dendritic cell vaccines, although these approaches are yet to yield significant clinical benefit. Potential reasons for the lack of success so far include the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, the blood-brain barrier, and systemic changes to the immune system driven by both the tumor and its treatment. Furthermore, while T cells are essential effector cells for tumor control, dendritic cells play an equally important role in T cell activation, and emerging evidence suggests the dendritic cell compartment may be deeply compromised in glioblastoma patients. In this review, we describe the immunotherapy approaches currently under development for glioblastoma and the challenges faced, with a particular emphasis on the critical role of the dendritic cell-T cell axis. We suggest a number of strategies that could be used to boost dendritic cell number and function and propose that the use of these in combination with T cell-targeting strategies could lead to successful tumor control.

Antibody drug conjugates: hitting the mark in pancreatic cancer?

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death, and the 5-year survival rate has only improved marginally over the last decade. Late detection of the disease means that in most cases the disease has advanced locally and/or metastasized, and curative surgery is not possible. Chemotherapy is still the first-line treatment however, this has only had a modest impact in improving survival, with associated toxicities. Therefore, there is an urgent need for targeted approaches to better treat pancreatic cancer, while minimizing treatment-induced side-effects. Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are one treatment option that could fill this gap. Here, a monoclonal antibody is used to deliver extremely potent drugs directly to the tumor site to improve on-target killing while reducing off-target toxicity. In this paper, we review the current literature for ADC targets that have been examined in vivo for treating pancreatic cancer, summarize current and on-going clinical trials using ADCs to treat pancreatic cancer and discuss potential strategies to improve their therapeutic window.

A first-in-human phase 1 study of nofazinlimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in advanced solid tumors and in combination with regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We assessed nofazinlimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in solid tumors and combined with regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: This phase 1 study comprised nofazinlimab dose escalation (phase 1a) and expansion (phase 1b), and regorafenib dose escalation (80 or 120 mg QD, days 1-21 of 28-day cycles) combined with 300-mg nofazinlimab Q4W (part 2a) to determine safety, efficacy, and RP2D. RESULTS: In phase 1a (N = 21), no dose-limiting toxicity occurred from 1 to 10 mg/kg Q3W, with 200 mg Q3W determined as the monotherapy RP2D. In phase 1b (N = 87), 400-mg Q6W and 200-mg Q3W regimens were found comparable. In part 2a (N = 14), both regimens were deemed plausible RP2Ds. Fatigue was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) in this study. Any-grade and grade 3/4 nofazinlimab-related AEs were 71.4% and 14.3%, 56.3% and 5.7%, and 57.1% and 21.4% in phases 1a, 1b, and part 2a, respectively. ORRs were 14.3% and 25.3% in phases 1a and 1b, respectively. In part 2a, no patients had radiological responses. CONCLUSIONS: Nofazinlimab monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated preliminary anti-tumor activity in multiple tumor types. Regorafenib plus nofazinlimab had a manageable safety profile but was not associated with any response in mCRC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTR ATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03475251).

Plasma glycoproteomic biomarkers identify metastatic melanoma patients with reduced clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

The clinical success of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in both resected and metastatic melanoma has confirmed the validity of therapeutic strategies that boost the immune system to counteract cancer. However, half of patients with metastatic disease treated with even the most aggressive regimen do not derive durable clinical benefit. Thus, there is a critical need for predictive biomarkers that can identify individuals who are unlikely to benefit with high accuracy so that these patients may be spared the toxicity of treatment without the likely benefit of response. Ideally, such an assay would have a fast turnaround time and minimal invasiveness. Here, we utilize a novel platform that combines mass spectrometry with an artificial intelligence-based data processing engine to interrogate the blood glycoproteome in melanoma patients before receiving ICI therapy. We identify 143 biomarkers that demonstrate a difference in expression between the patients who died within six months of starting ICI treatment and those who remained progression-free for three years. We then develop a glycoproteomic classifier that predicts benefit of immunotherapy (HR=2.7; p=0.026) and achieves a significant separation of patients in an independent cohort (HR=5.6; p=0.027). To understand how circulating glycoproteins may affect efficacy of treatment, we analyze the differences in glycosylation structure and discover a fucosylation signature in patients with shorter overall survival (OS). We then develop a fucosylation-based model that effectively stratifies patients (HR=3.5; p=0.0066). Together, our data demonstrate the utility of plasma glycoproteomics for biomarker discovery and prediction of ICI benefit in patients with metastatic melanoma and suggest that protein fucosylation may be a determinant of anti-tumor immunity.

Health-related quality of life in patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with immunotherapy.

Aims: To describe the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) patients throughout the first 18 weeks of ipilimumab-nivolumab or nivolumab treatment. Materials & methods: HRQoL data (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, additional Brain Neoplasm Module, and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire) were collected as a secondary outcome of the Anti-PD1 Brain Collaboration phase II trial. Mixed linear modeling assessed changes over time, whereas the Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine median time to first deterioration. Results: Asymptomatic MBM patients treated with ipilimumab-nivolumab (n = 33) or nivolumab (n = 24) maintained baseline HRQoL. MBM patients with symptoms or leptomeningeal/progressive disease treated with nivolumab (n = 14) reported a statistically significant trend toward improvement. Conclusion: MBM patients treated with either ipilimumab-nivolumab or nivolumab did not report a significant deterioration in HRQoL within 18 weeks of treatment initiation. Clinical trial registration: NCT02374242 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Historically, people whose melanoma had spread to the brain (known as brain metastases) lived only 4­6 months after diagnosis, with less than 15% alive at 12 months. However, the development of immunotherapies such as nivolumab and ipilimumab to treat advanced melanoma has resulted in more than 50% of patients being alive 5 years after diagnosis. With the effectiveness of these immunotherapies demonstrated in clinical trials, we wanted to examine the impact of these treatments on the health-related quality of life of people with melanoma brain metastases. Using data from a clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of immunotherapies in people diagnosed with melanoma brain metastases, this study investigated the impact of nivolumab and nivolumab combined with ipilimumab on quality of life. We found that neither nivolumab alone nor nivolumab combined with ipilimumab had a negative effect on quality of life. In summary, this study provides further support for the use of these immunotherapies as first-line treatment for melanoma brain metastases.

An anti-mesothelin targeting antibody drug conjugate induces pyroptosis and ignites antitumor immunity in mouse models of cancer.

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that the mechanism of chemotherapy-induced cell death may influence the antitumor immune response in patients with cancer. Unlike immunologically silent apoptosis, pyroptosis is a lytic and inflammatory form of programmed cell death characterized by pore formation in the cell membrane and release of proinflammatory factors. Gasdermin E (GSDME) has recently gained attention after cleavage of GSDME by certain chemotherapeutics has been shown to elicit pyroptosis. This study investigated the immunomodulatory effects of a mesothelin-targeting antibody drug conjugate (ADC) in mouse models of breast and colon cancer. METHODS: The antitumor effects of the ADC were studied in EMT6 breast cancer and CT26 colon cancer syngeneic mouse models. The immunomodulatory effects of the ADC were assessed by analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells using flow cytometry. ADC mechanism of action was evaluated by morphology, biological assays, ADC-mediated cleavage of key effector proteins, and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout (KO). Finally, the antitumor effect of ADC and Fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 ligand (Flt3L) combination therapy was evaluated in tumors expressing GSDME as well as in GSDME-silenced tumors. RESULTS: The data demonstrated that the ADC controlled tumor growth and stimulated anticancer immune responses. Investigation of the mechanism of action revealed that tubulysin, the cytotoxic payload of the ADC, induced cleavage of GSDME and elicited pyroptotic cell death in GSDME-expressing cells. Using GSDME KO, we showed that GSDME expression is critical for the effectiveness of the ADC as a monotherapy. Combining the ADC with Flt3L, a cytokine that expands dendritic cells in both lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues, restored control of GSDME KO tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results show for the first time that tubulysin and a tubulysin containing ADC can elicit pyroptosis, and that this fiery cell death is critical for antitumor immunity and therapeutic response.

Phase Ib open-label, multicenter study of pixatimod, an activator of TLR9, in combination with nivolumab in subjects with microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer, metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and other solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Pixatimod is a unique activator of the Toll-like Receptor 9 pathway. This phase I trial evaluated safety, efficacy and pharmacodynamics of pixatimod and PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab in immunologically cold cancers. METHODS: 3+3 dose escalation with microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer (MSS mCRC) and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) expansion cohorts. Participants received pixatimod once weekly as a 1-hour intravenous infusion plus nivolumab every 2 weeks. Objectives included assessment of safety, antitumor activity, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetic profile. RESULTS: Fifty-eight participants started treatment. The maximum tolerated dose of pixatimod was 25 mg in combination with 240 mg nivolumab, which was used in the expansion phases of the study. Twenty-one grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 12 participants (21%); one participant receiving 50 mg pixatimod/nivolumab had a treatment-related grade 5 AE. The grade 3/4 rate in the MSS mCRC cohort (n=33) was 12%. There were no responders in the mPDAC cohort (n=18). In the MSS mCRC cohort, 25 participants were evaluable (initial postbaseline assessment scans >6 weeks); of these, three participants had confirmed partial responses (PR) and eight had stable disease (SD) for at least 9 weeks. Clinical benefit (PR+SD) was associated with lower Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value and plasma IL-6 but increased IP-10 and IP-10/IL-8 ratio. In an MSS mCRC participant with PR as best response, increased infiltration of T cells, dendritic cells, and to a lesser extent NK cells, were evident 5 weeks post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Pixatimod is well tolerated at 25 mg in combination with nivolumab. The efficacy signal and pharmacodynamic changes in MSS mCRC warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05061017.

Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915).

PURPOSE: Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 1,833 patients received nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks (916 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (917 patients) for ≤ 1 year. After random assignment, patients were stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and stage. Dual primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) in randomly assigned patients and in the tumor PD-L1 expression-level < 1% subgroup. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of approximately 23.7 months, there was no significant difference between treatment groups for RFS in the all-randomly assigned patient population (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.09; P = .269) or in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1% (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14). In all patients, 24-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 0.4% of patients in the combination group and in no nivolumab-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks did not improve RFS versus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab showed efficacy consistent with previous adjuvant studies in a population resembling current practice using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition, reaffirming nivolumab as a standard of care for melanoma adjuvant treatment.

GD2-targeting CAR-T cells enhanced by transgenic IL-15 expression are an effective and clinically feasible therapy for glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive primary brain tumors such as glioblastoma are uniquely challenging to treat. The intracranial location poses barriers to therapy, and the potential for severe toxicity. Effective treatments for primary brain tumors are limited, and 5-year survival rates remain poor. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has transformed treatment of some other cancers but has yet to significantly benefit patients with glioblastoma. Early phase trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with glioblastoma have demonstrated that this approach is safe and feasible, but with limited evidence of its effectiveness. The choices of appropriate target antigens for CAR-T-cell therapy also remain limited. METHODS: We profiled an extensive biobank of patients' biopsy tissues and patient-derived early passage glioma neural stem cell lines for GD2 expression using immunomicroscopy and flow cytometry. We then employed an approved clinical manufacturing process to make CAR- T cells from patients with peripheral blood of glioblastoma and diffuse midline glioma and characterized their phenotype and function in vitro. Finally, we tested intravenously administered CAR-T cells in an aggressive intracranial xenograft model of glioblastoma and used multicolor flow cytometry, multicolor whole-tissue immunofluorescence and next-generation RNA sequencing to uncover markers associated with effective tumor control. RESULTS: Here we show that the tumor-associated antigen GD2 is highly and consistently expressed in primary glioblastoma tissue removed at surgery. Moreover, despite patients with glioblastoma having perturbations in their immune system, highly functional GD2-specific CAR-T cells can be produced from their peripheral T cells using an approved clinical manufacturing process. Finally, after intravenous administration, GD2-CAR-T cells effectively infiltrated the brain and controlled tumor growth in an aggressive orthotopic xenograft model of glioblastoma. Tumor control was further improved using CAR-T cells manufactured with a clinical retroviral vector encoding an interleukin-15 transgene alongside the GD2-specific CAR. These CAR-T cells achieved a striking 50% complete response rate by bioluminescence imaging in established intracranial tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting GD2 using a clinically deployed CAR-T-cell therapy has a sound scientific and clinical rationale as a treatment for glioblastoma and other aggressive primary brain tumors.

Three cases of BRAF-mutant melanoma with divergent differentiation masquerading as sarcoma.

Melanoma is an important cause of skin cancer related death throughout the world, particularly in Europe, the United States, and Australia. Rarely melanoma undergoes divergent differentiation to simulate the full morphologic and immunohistochemical features of other malignancies, notably sarcoma. However, such cases retain the molecular signatures of melanoma, including BRAF gene mutations. Gene mutation analysis of tumour DNA, now standard practice for all melanomas of stage III or above, may establish the diagnosis of melanoma in some advanced malignancies of unknown lineage. A prior history of melanoma or risk factors for melanoma may be the first clue that an advanced malignancy represents metastatic melanoma. Recognition of this presentation of melanoma can allow a patient to access well-tolerated life-prolonging therapies such as targeted therapy, inhibiting the BRAF/MEK pathway, and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Fc gamma receptor is not required for in vivo processing of radio- and drug-conjugates of the dead tumor cell-targeting monoclonal antibody, APOMAB®.

The Fc region of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) can play a crucial role in its biodistribution and therapeutic activity. The chimeric mAb, chDAB4 (APOMAB®), which binds to dead tumor cells after DNA-damaging anticancer treatment, has been studied pre-clinically in both diagnostic and therapeutic applications in cancer. Given that macrophages contribute to the tumor accumulation of chDAB4 and its potency as an antibody drug conjugate in vivo, we next wanted to determine whether the Fc region of the chDAB4 mAb also contributed. We found that, regardless of prior labeling with chDAB4, dead EL4 lymphoma or Lewis Lung (LL2) tumor cells were phagocytosed equally by wild-type or Fcγ knock-down macrophage cell lines. A similar result was seen with bone marrow-derived macrophages from wild-type, Fcγ knock-out (KO) and NOTAM mice that express Fcγ but lack immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) signaling. Among EL4 tumor-bearing wild-type, Fcγ KO or NOTAM mice, no differences were observed in post-chemotherapy uptake of 89Zr-labeled chDAB4. Similarly, no differences were observed between LL2 tumor-bearing wild-type and Fcγ KO mice in post-chemotherapy uptake of 89Zr-chDAB4. Also, the post-chemotherapy activity of a chDAB4-antibody drug conjugate (ADC) directed against LL2 tumors did not differ among tumor-bearing wild-type, Fcγ KO and NOTAM mice, nor did the proportions and characteristics of the LL2 tumor immune cell infiltrates differ significantly among these mice. In conclusion, Fc-FcγR interactions are not essential for the diagnostic or therapeutic applications of chDAB4 conjugates because the tumor-associated macrophages, which engulf the chDAB4-labelled dead cells, respond to endogenous 'eat me' signals rather than depend on functional FcγR expression for phagocytosis.

Aluminium Nanoparticles as Efficient Adjuvants Compared to Their Microparticle Counterparts: Current Progress and Perspectives.

Aluminium (Al) compounds are used as adjuvants in human and veterinary prophylactic vaccines due to their improved tolerability compared to other adjuvants. These Al-based adjuvants form microparticles (MPs) of heterogeneous sizes ranging from ~0.5 to 10 µm and generally induce type 2 (Th2)-biased immune responses. However, recent literature indicates that moving from micron dimension particles toward the nanoscale can modify the adjuvanticity of Al towards type 1 (Th1) responses, which can potentially be exploited for the development of vaccines for which Th1 immunity is crucial. Specifically, in the context of cancer treatments, Al nanoparticles (Al-NPs) can induce a more balanced (Th1/Th2), robust, and durable immune response associated with an increased number of cytotoxic T cells compared to Al-MPs, which are more favourable for stimulating an oncolytic response. In this review, we compare the adjuvant properties of Al-NPs to those of Al-MPs in the context of infectious disease vaccines and cancer immunotherapy and provide perspectives for future research.

Characterising Distinct Migratory Profiles of Infiltrating T-Cell Subsets in Human Glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive form of primary brain cancer, with no improvements in the 5-year survival rate of 4.6% over the past three decades. T-cell-based immunotherapies such as immune-checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy have prolonged the survival of patients with other cancers and have undergone early-phase clinical evaluation in glioblastoma patients. However, a major challenge for T-cell-based immunotherapy of glioblastoma and other solid cancers is T-cell infiltration into tumours. This process is mediated by chemokine-chemokine receptor and integrin-adhesion molecule interactions, yet the specific nature of the molecules that may facilitate T-cell homing into glioblastoma are unknown. Here, we have characterised chemokine receptor and integrin expression profiles of endogenous glioblastoma-infiltrating T cells, and the chemokine expression profile of glioblastoma-associated cells, by single-cell RNA-sequencing. Subsequently, chemokine receptors and integrins were validated at the protein level to reveal enrichment of receptors CCR2, CCR5, CXCR3, CXCR4, CXCR6, CD49a, and CD49d in glioblastoma-infiltrating T-cell populations relative to T cells in matched patient peripheral blood. Complementary chemokine ligand expression was then validated in glioblastoma biopsies and glioblastoma-derived primary cell cultures. Together, enriched expression of homing receptor-ligand pairs identified in this study implicate a potential role in mediating T-cell infiltration into glioblastoma. Importantly, our data characterising the migratory receptors on endogenous tumour-infiltrating T cells could be exploited to enhance the tumour-homing properties of future T-cell immunotherapies for glioblastoma.

Vasculogenic mimicry structures in melanoma support the recruitment of monocytes.

The progression of cancer is facilitated by infiltrating leukocytes which can either actively kill cancer cells or promote their survival. Our current understanding of leukocyte recruitment into tumors is largely limited to the adhesion molecules and chemokines expressed by conventional blood vessels that are lined by endothelial cells (ECs). However, cancer cells themselves can form their own vascular structures (a process known as vasculogenic mimicry (VM)); but whether they actively participate in the recruitment of leukocytes remains to be elucidated. Herein, we demonstrate that VM-competent human melanoma cell lines express multiple adhesion molecules (e.g. CD44, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 and junction adhesion molecules (JAMs)) and chemokines (e.g. CXCL8 and CXCL12) relevant for leukocyte recruitment. Microfluidic-based adhesion assays revealed that similar to ECs, VM-competent melanoma cells facilitate the rolling and adhesion of leukocytes, particularly monocytes, under conditions of shear flow. Moreover, we identified ICAM-1 to be a key participant in this process. Transwell assays showed that, similar to ECs, VM-competent melanoma cells facilitate monocyte transmigration toward a chemotactic gradient. Gene expression profiling of human melanoma patient samples confirmed the expression of numerous leukocyte capture adhesion molecules and chemokines. Finally, immunostaining of patient tissue microarrays revealed that tumors with high VM content also contained higher numbers of leukocytes (including macrophages). Taken together, this study suggests an underappreciated role of VM vessels in solid tumors via their active participation in leukocyte recruitment and begins to identify key adhesion molecules and chemokines that underpin this process.

The RNA-binding protein La/SSB associates with radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in lung cancer cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy are standard treatments for non-small cell lung cancer, which is the commonest, most lethal cancer worldwide. As a marker of treatment-induced cancer cell death, we have developed a radiodiagnostic imaging antibody, which binds to La/SSB. La/SSB is an essential, ubiquitous ribonuclear protein, which is over expressed in cancer and plays a role in resistance to cancer therapies. AIM: In this study, we examined radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in lung cancer cell lines and examined whether La/SSB associated with these DSB. METHOD: Three lung cancer lines (A549, H460 and LL2) were irradiated with different X-ray doses or X-radiated with a 5 Gy dose and examined at different time-points post-irradiation for DNA DSB in the form of γ-H2AX and Rad51 foci. Using fluorescence microscopy, we examined whether La/SSB and γ-H2AX co-localise and performed proximity ligation assay (PLA) and co-immunoprecipitation to confirm the interaction of these proteins. RESULTS: We found that the radio-resistant A549 cell line compared to the radio-sensitive H460 cell line showed faster resolution of radiation-induced γ-H2AX foci over time. Conversely, we found more co-localised γ-H2AX and La/SSB foci by PLA in irradiated A549 cells. CONCLUSION: The co-localisation of La/SSB with radiation-induced DNA breaks suggests a role of La/SSB in DNA repair, however further experimentation is required to validate this.

Demethylating therapy increases anti-CD123 CAR T cell cytotoxicity against acute myeloid leukemia.

Successful treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells is hampered by toxicity on normal hematopoietic progenitor cells and low CAR T cell persistence. Here, we develop third-generation anti-CD123 CAR T cells with a humanized CSL362-based ScFv and a CD28-OX40-CD3ζ intracellular signaling domain. This CAR demonstrates anti-AML activity without affecting the healthy hematopoietic system, or causing epithelial tissue damage in a xenograft model. CD123 expression on leukemia cells increases upon 5'-Azacitidine (AZA) treatment. AZA treatment of leukemia-bearing mice causes an increase in CTLA-4negative anti-CD123 CAR T cell numbers following infusion. Functionally, the CTLA-4negative anti-CD123 CAR T cells exhibit superior cytotoxicity against AML cells, accompanied by higher TNFα production and enhanced downstream phosphorylation of key T cell activation molecules. Our findings indicate that AZA increases the immunogenicity of AML cells, enhancing recognition and elimination of malignant cells by highly efficient CTLA-4negative anti-CD123 CAR T cells.

Drug repurposing: Misconceptions, challenges, and opportunities for academic researchers.

Drug repurposing is promoted as a cost- and time-effective mechanism for providing new medicines. Often, however, there is insufficient consideration by academic researchers of the processes required to ensure that a repurposed drug can be used for a new indication. This may explain the inability of drug repurposing to fulfill its promise. Important aspects, often overlooked, include financial and intellectual property considerations, the clinical and regulatory path, and clinical equipoise, which provides ethical justification for randomized controlled trials. The goal of drug repurposing is to obtain a new regulator-approved label for an existing drug, and so, the trajectory for drug repurposing and traditional drug development is similar. Here, we discuss factors critical for a successful repurposed medicine to help academic investigators better identify drug repurposing opportunities.

Erratum: Clinical chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: a new and promising treatment modality for glioblastoma.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1002/cti2.1050.].